The Realist Prism: Preparing for the 'Day After'
The Realist Prism: Preparing for the ‘Day After’ in Syria
By Nikolas Gvosdev
| 03 Feb 2012
Login to Discuss
Now that the United States, France and other Western powers have endorsed the Arab League’s call for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to step down — even if that formulation is ultimately edited out of the final draft of the resolution pending before the U.N. Security Council — it is time to start making plans for the various contingencies that may erupt on “the day after.”
Most Western policymakers, at least in their public rhetoric, continue to cling to an optimistic scenario in which a broad-based, inclusive opposition takes power in Damascus after an initial transition from Assad’s rule. Reassured of their role in the new Syria, the country’s Alawite and Christian populations, two of the communities that the current regime depends on for bedrock support, would have an incentive to participate peacefully in the post-Assad order. Of course, such a scenario appeals to U.S. and Western publics, weary from a decade of stabilization efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is simply not politically feasible for Western leaders to vigorously champion efforts to force Assad to step down if there is an expectation that Western forces be needed to guarantee the transition. …
Already a subscriber? Login here.
Read an overview of all that is included in our subscription service.
We also offer site-wide subscriptions for organizations of all types.
Get more information about our institutional service.
Login to Discuss
- World Citizen: With an Eye to U.S. Election, Israeli Politics Shift to High Gear
- Russia’s UNSC Defense of Syria Reflects Broader Diplomatic Weakness
- World Citizen: Israel, U.S. Fail Key Public Messaging Test
- Israel Ties Reflect India’s Realist Foreign Policy Consensus
- Over the Horizon: Syria, Iran and the Enduring Allure of Airpower